Skip to main content
· 2/19/1974

Maempe v. Enomoto

Citations

  • 415 U.S. 910
  • 94 S. Ct. 1455
  • 39 L. Ed. 2d 495

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • identifying two narrow exceptions: \to review charges that the Secretary violated a clear statutory mandate or prohibition ... and to consider constitutional claims\
  • “Our inquiry into whether there was a denial of due process involves a two-part analysis. We must determine whether [plaintiff] was deprived of a protected property interest, and if so, what process was due.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.