Madura v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Middle Dist. of Fla.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “federal courts will not consider new factual grounds in support of 2 the same legal claim that was previously presented”
• explaining 19 that “federal courts will not consider new factual grounds in support of the same legal claim 20 that was previously presented”
• subjecting petitioner’s “new” claims, including a freestanding actual innocence claim, to § 2244(b)(2)’s requirements
• “[F]ederal courts will not consider new factual grounds in support of the same legal claim that was previously presented.”
• “[F]ederal courts will not consider new factual grounds in support of the same legal claim that was previously presented.”
• “[F]ederal courts will not consider new factual grounds in support of the same legal claim that was previously presented.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).