Michigan Supreme Court· 7/15/2014

Madugula v. Taub

Citations

496 Mich. 685
853 N.W.2d 75

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the defendant was not entitled to a jury trial for an action brought under the Business Corporation Act for alleged violations of the shareholder-oppression provisions of the act, even though the statute also provided for damages as a remedy
explaining that statutory provisions must be interpreted in the context of the law as a whole
explaining that statutory provisions must be interpreted in the context of the law as a whole
recognizing that monetary damages “are generally a legal remedy.”
observing that damages are considered a legal, as opposed to an equitable remedy
stating that MCL 450.1489 is “commonly known as the shareholder-oppression statute[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Viviano, Young, Cavanagh, Markman, Kelly, Zahra, McCormack, Vmano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.