Madsen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because Sarmiento predates the 1982 amendment, it is no longer viable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Schaeffer
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-12-29· cited 76×
• L.S. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-17· cited 31×
• Mozo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-19· cited 15×
• Shaktman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-05-17· cited 10×
• State v. Dean
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-06-15· cited 3×
• Madsen v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-01-28· cited 2×
• LS v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-17

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Sarmiento
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-01-15· cited 82×
• State v. Ridenour
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-07-24· cited 11×
• State v. Hume
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-02-11· cited 8×