Skip to main content
· 7/2/2002

Madsen v. Adam Corp.

Citations

  • 647 N.W.2d 35
  • 2002 Minn. App. LEXIS 769
  • 2002 WL 1425383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that relator’s quit was medically necessary based in part on doctor’s note
  • reviewing application of the medical-necessity exception de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Randall, Stoneburner, Huspeni

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.