Madrona Grocery Co. v. Wallin

Citations

• 57 Wash. 136
• 106 P. 617
• 1910 Wash. LEXIS 711

Syllabus

<p>Trial — Misconduct of Attorney — Questions to Show Indemnity of Party. In an action against a constable for the wrongful seizure of property under execution, it is not misconduct of the plaintiff’s counsel, or prejudice warranting a new trial, that'he asked the constable “why he did not obtain an indemnity bond” when he found that the plaintiff claimed the property, and “you did not obtain any security prior to your levy, did you,” objections to which were sustained; as the questions did not intimate that the party was indemnified, but rather the contrary, and no prejudice was shown.</p>