Skip to main content
· 12/30/1976

Madore v. Baltimore County

Citations

  • 367 A.2d 54
  • 34 Md. App. 340
  • 1976 Md. App. LEXIS 334

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • construing the notice provision of Art. 57, § 18 as “a condition precedent to the right to maintain the suit”
  • construing the notice provision of Art. 57, § 18 as \a condition precedent to the right to maintain the suit\
  • finding no good cause where a seriously-injured plaintiff was without counsel during the 180-day notice period but could have retained counsel “if it had occurred to him”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, Powers, Lowe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.