· 6/24/2004
Madol v. Dan Nelson Automotive Group
Citations
- 372 F.3d 997
- 2004 WL 1403431
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that claims that transactions as a 5 whole were unconscionable raised for the first time in response to motion to compel should 6 be resolved by an arbitrator because they were not claims directly attacking the arbitration 7 agreement in and of itself
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arnold, Magill, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.