Skip to main content
· 6/24/2004

Madol v. Dan Nelson Automotive Group

Citations

  • 372 F.3d 997
  • 2004 WL 1403431

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claims that transactions as a 5 whole were unconscionable raised for the first time in response to motion to compel should 6 be resolved by an arbitrator because they were not claims directly attacking the arbitration 7 agreement in and of itself

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Magill, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.