Madlener v. Greathouse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well settled in Ohio that the giving of a renewal note does not have the effect of creating a new debt, . . . unless it has been so agreed between the parties; the presumption is that it is conditional, not an absolute payment of the obligation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Holland v. Associates Finance (In Re Holland)
  N.D. Ohio· 1981-12-14· cited 11×
• In re Wyse Laboratories, Inc.
  S.D. Ohio· 1949-07-14· cited 5×
• Noland v. Wilmington Savings Bank (In re D & K Aviation, Inc.)
  S.D. Ohio· 2006-09-01· cited 2×
• Brian Bash v. Textron Fin. Corp.
  Sixth Circuit· 2021-09-10· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Minerva Sav & Tr Co. v. Lyder
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 1930-07-01· cited 5×