Madison v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court does not possess the discretion to allow hybrid representation without first conducting a Far-etta inquiry
• holding that appointment of defendant as co-counsel without conducting a Faretta inquiry required reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Boyd v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-20· cited 9×
• Bowers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-04

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Payne v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-09-08· cited 6×
• Brooks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-23· cited 6×