· 3/6/2000
Madison v. Motion Picture Set Painters & Sign Writers Local 729
Citations
- 132 F. Supp. 2d 1244
- 164 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2028
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20979
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the Court must look at the conduct at the heart of the controversy”
- noting that the DFR “applies to all representational activity in which the union engages”
- To prove discrimination, plaintiff would have to show that defendant did not follow the grievance procedures in the CBA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Morrow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.