Madison v. Hollywood Subs, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where day-to-day operations were within sole control of the franchisee no agency relationship existed with franchisor
• “[T]he only control provided by the agreement was to insure uniformity in the standardization of products and services offered by the restaurant. The day to day operations were within the sole control of the franchisee.”
• franchisee was not franchisor’s agent and thus franchisor could not be held liable to estate of customer who was shot and killed while a passenger in a car in a drive-through lane of franchisee’s restaurant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).