Madison Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Hambden Sportsman Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a ban on dial-a-porn is not appropriate for adults, although it might be for minors
• holding that a ban on dial-a-porn is not appropriate for adults, although it might be for minors
• concluding that a “total ban” on indecent interstate commercial telephone messages was not narrowly tailored to protect children from exposure to indecent dial-a-porn messages
• holding that regulation of indecent telephone message services had to be narrowly tailored to serve compelling government interest
• holding that while legislative findings are due deference, that cannot foreclose a court’s constitutional analysis
• holding that a ban on dial-a-porn is not appropriate for adults, although it might be for minors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).