Skip to main content
· 1/9/2006

Madison Hobley v. Jon Burge, Robert Dwyer, City of Chicago, Appeal Of: Jones Day

Citations

  • 433 F.3d 946
  • 63 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 921
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 449
  • 2006 WL 39257

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a party “asserting privilege must timely support that claim with a ‘privilege log’ which describes the nature of each document being withheld”
  • explaining that Rule 26(b)(3) “establish[es] a zone of privacy in which lawyers can analyze and prepare their client’s case free from scrutiny or interference by an adversary” (citation omitted)
  • “[work product] privilege endures after termination of the proceedings for which the documents were created, especially if the old and new matters are related.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Evans, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.