· 1/4/1991
Madigan v. Potrans International, Inc. (In Re Madigan)
Citations
- 122 B.R. 103
- 91 Daily Journal DAR 450
- 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 331
- 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 8
- 1991 WL 368
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining § 726(a) in terms of \the election of remedies doctrine\ and stating that the purpose of the statute \is to prevent the creditor from enforcing its rights by more than one remedy\
- explaining § 726(a) in terms of “the election of remedies doctrine” and stating that the purpose of the statute “is to prevent the creditor from enforcing its rights by more than one remedy”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Volinn, Jones, Meyers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.