Skip to main content
· 1/4/1991

Madigan v. Potrans International, Inc. (In Re Madigan)

Citations

  • 122 B.R. 103
  • 91 Daily Journal DAR 450
  • 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 331
  • 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 8
  • 1991 WL 368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining § 726(a) in terms of \the election of remedies doctrine\ and stating that the purpose of the statute \is to prevent the creditor from enforcing its rights by more than one remedy\
  • explaining § 726(a) in terms of “the election of remedies doctrine” and stating that the purpose of the statute “is to prevent the creditor from enforcing its rights by more than one remedy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Volinn, Jones, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.