Madge Schultz v. Wayland Schultz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring actual authority by appointment and recognizing that both Punke v. Brody, 17 Wis. 2d 9, 115 N.W.2d 601 (1962), and Howard are consistent with federal law
• “[T]he fact that [the attorney] was defendant’s attorney in an unrelated action furnishes no basis for the validation of the service of process on him as such[.]”
• plaintiff argues that attorney, who made a special appearance for the defendant for the purpose of moving the court to dismiss the action on the grounds of, inter alia, insufficiency of service, had implied authority to receive process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).