Madera v. Marsh USA, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[b]efore a plaintiff asserts an ERISA claim . . . [she] must exhaust [her] administrative remedies” under the plan
• requiring that the administrator’s decision be upheld if “there is any reasonable basis for it”
• affirming denial of benefits where there was contemporaneous evidence that the terminated employee “forwarded internal e-mails containing . . . confidential and/or proprietary information to a direct competitor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).