Maddox v. ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that the various courts to have interpreted the pri- or publication exception have assumed the prior publication must cause the same sort of injuries as the latter publication
• “[L]ogically[,] the point of the exclusion is to prevent a[] [company that] has caused an injury from buying insurance so that [it] can continue [its] injurious behavior.”
• “[L]ogically[,] the point of the exclusion is to prevent a[] [company that] has caused an injury from buying insurance so that [it] can continue [its] injurious behavior.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).