Maddock v. KB Homes, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence of providing training materials and human resource guidance, direction and support to management personnel by the parent does not establish involvement in the day-to-day personnel decisions of subsidiaries
• court denied employee’s 21 attempt to amend complaint to add a new defendant
• “Plaintiff does not dispute that the first factor has not 9 been met.”
• “Plaintiff has produced no evidence 8 to refute KB Home’s assertions that KBLA, not KB Home, supervised and determined the 9 duties of their sales agents in accordance with the salesperson employment agreements 10 signed by plaintiff.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).