Maddin v. State Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining damages caused by DOE’s breach based on plaintiffs need to maintain full core reserve
• similarly concluding that a nuclear plant owner invested in PFS for reasons other than to mitigate the effects of DOE’s delay
• “If a proportional amount of the utility’s general overhead is not allocated to the [mitigation efforts], other projects and ... operations will support an unequal share of the overhead costs.”
• “[T]he government must affirmatively establish that the mitigation was inappropriate or unreasonable.”
• “The defendant thus rejects the fundamental nature of overhead damages.”
• $3,757,908 for 10 months of wet pool costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).