Madden v. Milk Wagon Drivers Union Local 753

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “Fulks–Graham has not contended and cannot demonstrate that a substantial need exists for this document”
• because the work product 12 doctrine is not an evidentiary privilege “but rather, [a] procedural limitation[] on discovery, 13 the scope of [the] asserted protection[] is determined by federal law, even when the federal 14 court sits in diversity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).