Madden v. Cox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the adequacy of an expert's knowledge went to the weight of the testimony, not its admissibility, and thus presented a 8 jury question
• holding design defects may be based on negligence, strict torts, or warranty
• stating an appellate court cannot judge the credibility or weight that should be given expert testimony, as these considerations are for the jury
• appellate court cannot judge the weight or credibility of testimony on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).