Skip to main content
· 10/20/1988

Maddalone v. C.D.C., Inc.

Citations

  • 765 P.2d 1047
  • 12 Brief Times Rptr. 1449
  • 1988 Colo. App. LEXIS 351
  • 1988 WL 110042

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that garnishees were entitled to evidentiary hearing on the validity of the debt that underlay the garnishment
  • stating that garnishees were entitled to evidentiary hearing on the validity of the debt that underlay the garnishment
  • cataloguing differences between garnishment proceedings under C.R.C.P. 103 and execution proceedings under C.R. C.P. 69
  • cataloguing differences between garnishment proceedings under C.R.C.P. 103 and execution proceedings under C.R. C.P. 69

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ney, Babcock, Plank

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.