Michigan Court of Appeals· 6/17/1986

Madar v. League General Insurace

Citations

394 N.W.2d 90
152 Mich. App. 734

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that the decedent’s interest in his own health and well-being was sufficient to support entitlement to PIP benefits “regardless of whether a covered vehicle is involved”
PIP coverage applies to the insured person, and not to the motor vehicle
PIP coverage applies to the insured person, and not to the motor vehicle
“It is clear that the policy behind this principle is to prevent an insurer from retroactively cancelling coverage on a date prior to the date of the accident in order to shift liability to another insurer under the priority provisions of the no-fault act.”
“It is clear that the policy behind this principle is to prevent an insurer from retroactively cancelling coverage on a date prior to the date of the accident in order to shift liability to another insurer under the priority provisions of the no-fault act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Danhof, Hood, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.