Madar v. League General Insurace

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the decedent’s interest in his own health and well-being was sufficient to support entitlement to PIP benefits “regardless of whether a covered vehicle is involved”
• PIP coverage applies to the insured person, and not to the motor vehicle
• PIP coverage applies to the insured person, and not to the motor vehicle
• “It is clear that the policy behind this principle is to prevent an insurer from retroactively cancelling coverage on a date prior to the date of the accident in order to shift liability to another insurer under the priority provisions of the no-fault act.”
• “It is clear that the policy behind this principle is to prevent an insurer from retroactively cancelling coverage on a date prior to the date of the accident in order to shift liability to another insurer under the priority provisions of the no-fault act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).