Macria v. Linder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the allegations of the plaintiff— which are substantially similar to Secrest’s allegations—sufficient, and rejecting the argument that the plaintiff must plead specific weeks or hours of overtime
• “[T]he Court rejects Defendant's argument that Plaintiff must specify the time period or approximate number of hours worked during a given period to state an FLSA claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).