Supreme Court of Minnesota· 7/31/2008
MacRae v. Group Health Plan, Inc.
Citations
- 753 N.W.2d 711
- 2008 Minn. LEXIS 361
- 2008 WL 2917623
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that courts should “not make inferential leaps in favor of the defendant to conclude that a lawsuit is time-barred”
- stating that the prima facie case for medical malpractice requires (1) a showing of the applicable standard of care, (2) that the defendant departed from that standard, and (3) “that the defendant’s departure from the standard was a direct cause of the patient’s injuries”
- Throughout this opinion, we mostly use the term reduced chance rather than the more common term loss of chance to avoid confusion between the two potential claims compared and discussed here — a mere reduction in chance of survival (loss-of-chance or reduced-chance claim
- defining the “essential elements for medical malpractice claims”
- setting forth elements of medical negligence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mark A. Hallberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Park Nicollet Clinic v. HamannSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-12-07· cited 140×
- Residential Funding Company v. Terrace Mortgage CompanyEighth Circuit· 2013-08-07· cited 33×
- Dickhoff ex rel. Dickhoff v. GreenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-05-31· cited 21×
- Fleeger v. WyethSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-09-03· cited 19×
- Huggins v. Stryker Corp.D. Minnesota· 2013-03-25· cited 18×
- BankCHEROKEE v. INSIGNIA DEVELOPMENT, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-03-16· cited 12×
- Blohm v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-05-12· cited 9×
- Block v. Toyota Motor Corp.D. Minnesota· 2014-03-18· cited 7×
- Dickhoff ex rel. Dickhoff v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2012-01-03· cited 1×
- Gallaher v. TitlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2012-04-30· cited 1×
- Stroop v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-04-21
- Doug Hoskin, Appellant, vs. Josh Krsnak, et al., RespondentsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2025-09-10
- State of Minnesota Office of the Attorney General v. Madison Equities, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2026-01-07
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-08-20· cited 547×
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-07-22· cited 379×
- Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-04-19· cited 92×
- K.A.C. v. BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-02-10· cited 78×
- State Ex Rel. Foster v. NaftalinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1956-01-20· cited 69×
- Plutshack Ex Rel. Plutshack v. University of Minnesota HospitalsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-02-12· cited 48×
- DeBoer v. BrownArizona Supreme Court· 1983-11-16· cited 45×
- State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Aquila Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-08-03· cited 41×
- Herrmann v. McMenomy & SeversonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-04-08· cited 41×
- St. George v. PariserSupreme Court of Virginia· 1997-04-18· cited 38×
- Molloy v. MeierSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-05-20· cited 38×
- Antone v. MirvissSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-08-17· cited 32×
- Leubner v. SternerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-12-18· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.