· 7/31/2008
MacRae v. Group Health Plan, Inc.
Citations
- 753 N.W.2d 711
- 2008 Minn. LEXIS 361
- 2008 WL 2917623
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that courts should “not make inferential leaps in favor of the defendant to conclude that a lawsuit is time-barred”
- stating that the prima facie case for medical malpractice requires (1) a showing of the applicable standard of care, (2) that the defendant departed from that standard, and (3) “that the defendant’s departure from the standard was a direct cause of the patient’s injuries”
- Throughout this opinion, we mostly use the term reduced chance rather than the more common term loss of chance to avoid confusion between the two potential claims compared and discussed here — a mere reduction in chance of survival (loss-of-chance or reduced-chance claim
- defining the “essential elements for medical malpractice claims”
- setting forth elements of medical negligence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mark A. Hallberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.