Macmurdo v. Mason

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no tortious interference where defendant’s work with the third-party was called for in its contract with plaintiff
• acknowledging the conclusions of “post-McCulloch anti- assignment provision cases” which render “any assignment of benefits a legal nullity”
• affirming “the ineffectiveness of assignments of ERISA plan benefits where the plan contains an unambiguous anti-assignment provision”
• dismissing §502(a)(3) claim as an attempt to “repackage” §502(a)(1) claim where “plaintiff is not seeking equitable relief at all, but rather seeks the balance of the billed and unreimbursed medical expenses—the exact same relief sought in plaintiff[’]s § 502(a)(1)(B

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).