MacManus v. Marel, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “any error in the court’s charge, which did include a reading of the statutory provision delineating the elements of accessorial liability ... as well as detailed definitions of the requisite mental states for the crimes charged, was harmless. ...”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).