MacLeod v. Procter & Gamble Disability Benefit Plan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• first Chambless factor favored plaintiff where defendants’ “adoption of the categorical military exclusion violated ERISA by contravening the plain language of the [p]lan”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).