MacKu by and Through MacKu v. Drackett Prod. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding § 25-224(4)’s two-year extension was subject to tolling for a minor
• construction of a statute which changes, or abolishes common-law rights should not be adopted, \unless the plain words of the statute compel such result\
• “[A]t common law an infant could sue only by a guardian, because an infant was not sui juris—a person with legal capacity to act for oneself.”
• “[A]t common law an infant could sue only by a guardian, because an infant was not sui juris—a person with legal capacity to act for oneself.”
• \[W]e have neither been cited to nor are we aware of any case in which we have permitted a parent to recover for the loss of a nonfatally injured minor child's consortium.\
• \[W]e have neither been cited to nor are we aware of any case in which we have permitted a parent to recover for the loss of a nonfatally injured minor child's consortium.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).