MacKoul v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the limits of liability are not affected by the number of causes of action that might accrue from the bodily injury of a single person
• finding that the limits of liability were not affected by the number of causes of action that might accrue from the bodily injury of a single person
• interpreting limit of liability provision in UM policy and holding that policy limits were not affected by the number of claims that might accrue from the bodily injury of a single person

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).