Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2/9/2006

MacKey v. Compass Marketing, Inc.

Citations

  • 892 A.2d 479
  • 391 Md. 117
  • 2006 Md. LEXIS 67

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “one co-conspirator may be the ‘agent’ of (continued . . .
  • explaining that, “[i]f the statutory language is unambiguous when construed according to its ordinary and everyday meaning, then we give effect to the statute as written”
  • stating that it is not permissible to simply dispense with analysis under the long-arm statute
  • stating that it is not permissible to simply dispense with analysis under the long-arm statute
  • noting that courts have routinely drawn on the substantive law of agency as justification for exercising jurisdiction over nonresident defendants and that conspiracy theory jurisdiction is an analogous concept
  • noting that courts have routinely drawn on the substantive law of agency as justification for exercising jurisdiction over nonresident defendants and that conspiracy theory jurisdiction is an analogous concept

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Raker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named MacKey v. Compass Marketing, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.