MacKey v. Compass Marketing, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “one co-conspirator may be the ‘agent’ of (continued . . .
• explaining that, “[i]f the statutory language is unambiguous when construed according to its ordinary and everyday meaning, then we give effect to the statute as written”
• stating that it is not permissible to simply dispense with analysis under the long-arm statute
• stating that it is not permissible to simply dispense with analysis under the long-arm statute
• noting that courts have routinely drawn on the substantive law of agency as justification for exercising jurisdiction over nonresident defendants and that conspiracy theory jurisdiction is an analogous concept
• noting that courts have routinely drawn on the substantive law of agency as justification for exercising jurisdiction over nonresident defendants and that conspiracy theory jurisdiction is an analogous concept

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).