Skip to main content
· 2/6/1912

Mackenzie v. Salmon

Citations

  • 146 Ky. 616
  • 143 S.W. 20
  • 1912 Ky. LEXIS 125

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for consideration of new evidence where the Appeals Council failed to adequately discuss the new evidence in its denial of plaintiffs request for review
  • remanding where Appeals Council cursorily rejected new medical opinion that provided context to earlier medical opinion rejected by ALJ and addressed issues raised by ALJ in rejecting earlier opinion
  • remanding where Appeals Council cursorily rejected new medical opinion that provided context to earlier medical opinion rejected by ALJ and addressed issues raised by ALJ in rejecting earlier opinion
  • remanding where Appeals Council cursorily rejected new medical opinion that provided context to earlier medical opinion rejected by ALJ and addressed issues raised by the ALJ in rejecting the earlier opinion
  • remanding where Appeals Council cursorily rejected new medical opinion 12 that provided context to earlier medical opinion rejected by ALJ and addressed issues raised by the ALJ in rejecting the earlier opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.