Skip to main content
· 8/7/1986

MacKay v. Quigg

Citations

  • 641 F. Supp. 567
  • 231 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 907
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21752

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no negligence or suppression before the Board of evidence on issue raised below and, thus, allowing introduction of new evidence on previously raised issue
  • bald assertion that proponent did not intentionally or negligently fail to submit proffered evidence to PTO is insufficient to justify admission by district court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas F. Hogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.