MacKall v. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claims predicated on the ineffective assistance of trial counsel fall within the scope of § 23-110 and are barred from collateral review in federal court if already considered in Superior Court and the DCCA
• granting respondent’s motion to dismiss § 2254 petition because petitioner failed to exhaust underlying IAAC claim based “on wholly different issues that were not presented to the [Court of Appeals]” in motion to recall mandate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).