Mack v. Washington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a criminal case implicates an important State interest because State criminal prosecutions have traditionally been considered an arena in which federal courts decline to interfere
• holding that state court criminal proceedings traditionally implicate an important state interest
• observing “state criminal prosecutions have traditionally been considered an arena in which federal courts decline to interfere”
• holding state criminal proceedings traditionally implicate an important state interest
• affirming abstention dismissal of § 1983 complaint challenging ongoing criminal case
• a criminal case implicates an important state interest as state criminal prosecutions have traditionally been considered an arena in which federal courts decline to interfere

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).