· 10/12/2016
Mack v. the State
Citations
- 338 Ga. App. 854
- 792 S.E.2d 120
- 2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 556
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the EEOC charge itself determines the “reasonable and likely scope of the investigation”
- explaining that a plaintiff has 90 days to file suit after receiving the EEOC’s Right to Sue letter
- explaining that plaintiff’s “‘window’ to sue closed” 90 days after the EEOC issued its right-to-sue letter
- explaining that plaintiff’s “‘window’ to sue closed” 90 days after EEOC issued its right-to-sue letter
- explaining that plaintiff’s “‘window’ to sue closed” 90 days after the EEOC issued its right to sue letter
- explaining that dismissal should be without prejudice when predicated on a failure to exhaust administrative remedies
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peterson, Phipps, Dillard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.