Skip to main content
· 10/12/2016

Mack v. the State

Citations

  • 338 Ga. App. 854
  • 792 S.E.2d 120
  • 2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 556

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the EEOC charge itself determines the “reasonable and likely scope of the investigation”
  • explaining that a plaintiff has 90 days to file suit after receiving the EEOC’s Right to Sue letter
  • explaining that plaintiff’s “‘window’ to sue closed” 90 days after the EEOC issued its right-to-sue letter
  • explaining that plaintiff’s “‘window’ to sue closed” 90 days after EEOC issued its right-to-sue letter
  • explaining that plaintiff’s “‘window’ to sue closed” 90 days after the EEOC issued its right to sue letter
  • explaining that dismissal should be without prejudice when predicated on a failure to exhaust administrative remedies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peterson, Phipps, Dillard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.