District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2/20/2013
Mack v. State
Citations
- 106 So. 3d 1011
- 2013 WL 616417
- 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2603
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no error where the State authenticated and linked latent fingerprint evidence to the case through the testimony of an expert fingerprint witness, but not the actual detective who lifted the prints at the crime scene
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rothenberg, Salter, Suarez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Coday v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-10-26· cited 94×
- Justus v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-09-01· cited 63×
- Daniels v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-15· cited 18×
- H & H ELEC., INC. v. LopezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-10· cited 17×
- Roosevelt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-04· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.