MacK v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• identifying May 26, 1988, as the day after the second thirty-day period would have run.
• “Movant [Mack] failed to request an evidentiary hearing within the time constraints of Rule 29.15(g), therefore the trial court correctly refused to hold a hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thomas v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1991-05-03· cited 81×
• Freddie Mack v. Paul D. Caspari
  Eighth Circuit· 1996-10-21· cited 56×
• Martsay Bolder, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Bill Armontrout, Appellant/cross-Appellee
  Eighth Circuit· 1990-12-12· cited 38×
• Watson v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1989-08-08· cited 4×
• State v. Meyers
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1992-05-19· cited 2×
• Liebeck v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1995-11-16· cited 2×
• Freddie Mack v. Paul D. Caspari
  Eighth Circuit· 1996-08-08