Skip to main content

MacK v. State

Citations

  • 481 So. 2d 793

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that no difference exists between direct and circumstantial evidence of which our law rationally can or ought to take account
  • \I would have our juries instructed that the law makes no distinction between direct and circumstantial evidence... .\
  • \There is no reason on principle why an admission by the defendant on a significant element of the offense should not also operate to render unnecessary the circumstantial evidence instruction.\
  • here there was an admission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patterson, C.J., and Prather and Robertson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.