Skip to main content
· 4/7/1986

MacK v. Smith

Citations

  • 344 S.E.2d 474
  • 178 Ga. App. 652
  • 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 1724

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a “pre-answer motion” is sufficient to “constitute an entry of appearance”
  • where plaintiffs lack of purchase of the securities or investments contracts offered to him by defendants deprived him of standing under federal and state securities statutes, but was not the basis for affirmance of the dismissal of his common-law fraud claim
  • offeree who did not purchase securities lacked standing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pope, McMurray, Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.