MacK v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting summary judgment to employer when plaintiff did not allege or introduce evidence to show that the individuals who allegedly created a hostile work environment for her were en- \\ titled to make policy for the employer
• finding allegations that supervisor called plaintiff a “boy,” petty criticisms of nonwhite workers and disparate work 24 assignment, and disparate enforcement of lunch and break limitations inadequate for race-based hostile work environment claim
• finding allegations that supervisor called plaintiff a “boy,” petty criticisms of nonwhite workers and disparate work assignment, and disparate enforcement of lunch and break limitations inadequate to plead race-based hostile work environment claim
• allegation that plaintiff was called “good boy” multiple times was insufficient to sustain hostile work environment claim
• allegation that plaintiff was called “good boy” multiple times insufficient to sustain hostile work environment claim
• “Although the Port Authority, a bi-state agency, is not technically a municipality, courts have treated it as such and have analyzed claims against it under the standards governing municipal liability under Section 1983.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).