MacK v. Plaza Dewitt Limited Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Act requires a misrepresentation of a material fact
• explaining that the Act requires a misrepresentation of a material fact
• “A misrepresentation is ‘material’ and therefore actionable if it is such that had the other party been aware of it, he would have acted differently.”
• “A misrepresentation is ‘material’ and therefore actionable if it is such that had the other party been aware of it, he would have acted differently.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).