MacK v. McGrath

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that liability cannot be predicated on the remote possibility that a vehicle would jump a curb and expose tenants to injury
• holding that recovery for risk of malfunction of remaining kidney was “generous but not excessive” because it was “fair comment with respect to the implications of * * * being left with only one kidney”
• holding that recovery for risk of malfunction of remaining kidney was \generous but not excessive\ because it was \fair comment with respect to the implications of * * * being left with only one kidney\
• concluding that liability cannot be predicated on the remote possibility that a vehicle would jump a curb and expose tenants to injury
• motor vehicle jumped curb, broke through a plate-glass window, and “propelled fixtures and furniture against the plaintiff” who was working inside the building
• motor vehicle jumped curb, broke through a plate-glass window, and “propelled fixtures and furniture against the plaintiff” who was working inside the building

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).