Mack Trucks, Inc. v. International Union

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding in context of a CBA that \[t]he parties' objective intent to create a contract is relevant--not their subjective beliefs\
• holding that we look to “federal labor relations law, not state contract law,” to ascertain if a contract has formed, as “[i]n the field of labor relations, the technical rules of contract law do not determine the existence of an agreement”
• holding in context of a CBA that “[t]he parties’ objective intent to create a contract is relevant— not their subjective beliefs”
• holding in context of a CBA that \[t]he parties' objective intent to create a contract is relevant -- not their subjective beliefs\
• \Adoption of an enforceable labor contract does not depend on the reduction to writing of the parties' intention to be bound.\
• \The parties' objective intent to create a contract is relevant -- not their subjective beliefs.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).