Mack Davis v. Town of Lake Park, Florida, a Florida Municipal Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that absent an increase in salary, benefits, or unique opportunities for advancement, plaintiff has not shown a transfer constitutes an adverse employment action
• holding that day-to-day criticism, even if unwarranted, without more rarely will establish an adverse employment action for purposes of Title VII
• holding that although direct economic consequences is not required in all cases, the impact on a plaintiff's terms, conditions, or privileges of employment must be tangible
• holding that temporary reassignment without any tangible harm was not actionable under Title VII
• holding that negative job performance memo in employee’s file was not adverse employment action because memo did not result in any “tangible consequence . . . in the form of loss of pay or benefits or further discipline”
• cautioning that a court should not act as a “super-personnel department” by questioning an employer’s business judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).