MacIntosh v. Building Owners & Managers Ass'n International

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he evidence supports the conclusion that individual issues of fact predominate with respect to whether [defendants’ product] benefitted or harmed any particular person” since it would require consideration of each “particular plaintiffs medical history”
• denying class certification of unjust enrichment because whether any individual benefitted from Baycol would require consideration of each individual’s particular medical history

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).