· 7/9/2002
MacHulsky v. Hall
Citations
- 210 F. Supp. 2d 531
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13285
- 2002 WL 1611553
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- clarifying minimal email correspondence “by itself or even in conjunction with his single purchase, does not constitute sufficient minimum contacts”
- Plaintiff failed to show Defendants engaged in more than single internet transactions with forum state.
- buyer’s negative eBay feedback about seller was not purposefully directed toward seller’s home state of New Jersey
- minimal email correspondence, “by itself or even in conjunction with a single purchase, does not constitute sufficient minimum contacts.”
- “[M]inimal correspondence alone will not satisfy minimum contacts.” (quoting Barrett v. Catacombs Press, 44 F. Supp. 2d 717, 729 (E.D. Pa. 1999))
- “the act of entering into a contract with a foreign jurisdiction, without more, cannot serve as a basis for asserting personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brotman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.