Skip to main content
· 9/1/2006

MacHtinger v. INTERTIAL AIRLINE SERVICES, INC.

Citations

  • 937 So. 2d 730
  • 2006 WL 2520918

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that although review of a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is de novo, “where the trial court’s decision is based on live testimony, the appellate court defers to the trial court’s determination of the facts”
  • finding personal jurisdiction existed in Florida where conspiracy was made in Ohio but acts in furtherance of the conspiracy were done in and directed toward Florida
  • “Directing a conspiracy toward Florida establishes sufficient minimum contacts to satisfy due process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ramirez, Suarez, and Rothenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.