MacHne Menachem, Inc. v. Hershkop

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Spritzer’s testimony regarding the transfer of money and the cashing of checks between the Corporation and his own company, A-l Merchandising, without any board involvement compel the conclusion that Spritzer had indeed, arrogated to himself the affairs of the Corporation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).